Thursday, September 14, 2017
Most of us don't examine our own beliefs very much or very often. We pick up a few in childhood. Change all of them in our adolescence. And then acquire another layer of beliefs in our early adulthood. Then we stop asking questions and get jobs.
There are lots of people that believe in God because their parents taught them to. There are an equal number that don't because their parent taught them to and they rebelled later. Neither of these reasons is a good reason.
There are lots of people that are Democrats or Republicans because their parents were. There are an equal number that aren't because their parents were and they rebelled and picked the other party. Neither is a good reason.
I could go on and on. Groups of people that like Coke or Pepsi. Groups of people that believe in vaccination or not. Groups of people that believe in global warming or not. Groups of people that have good oral hygiene or not.
The vast majority of people have these beliefs or preferences and haven't thought about them for many years. Sometimes decades. That is why this question is important.
People that think that they are living the examined life will be saying. "But I have asked this question." And they are expecting the question to be, "Why do you believe the way you do?" And this is a good question. But it is not the best question.
Whether it was in your youth, at your parent's knee, or through a mature study and examination, everyone has a conversion experience to all of their beliefs and preferences. There is a reason you believe the way you do. It is important, but not as important as you think.
And that leads us to the real question. The most important question. The question that will help you peel back the layers of tradition, and habit, and peer pressure. The question that will show you what things you believe and know for good reasons and the things you are only clinging to because it's easier than figuring it out on your own or for some fanatical and unreasonable reason.
The question is, "What would it take to change your mind?"
Simple isn't it. It has an elegant structure that is unassuming. Yet it also has a sharp edge that can cut away the facade like a scalpel.
If we use this question well, we will not only find out what we really believe and think, but will discover better reasons. We may change our minds on a few things that we thought we believed.
When we are in a discussion of some conflict or controversy. We can reduce the fighting by saying, "In order for me to be convinced and change my mind, this is required." This required evidence will either show us to be a fanatic or will give the discussion a more rational basis.
Applying this question does not need to wait for an argument. Each of us is capable of asking this question of ourselves. What would it take to change my mind that Macs are better than PCs? What would it take to change my mind that eating meat is not inferior to vegetarian diets? What would it take to change my mind on politics, religion, or personal preference and belief?
Once applied, the question shows us things that we are accepting and even acting on that we have not examined thoroughly. It will show us things that we believe that we are fanatics about. Fanatics are people that have a belief or argument that cannot be falsified.
Most of the time we think of fanatics as religious. So let's start with that example. If you ask yourself, "What would it take for me to change my mind about my Church or Religion?" And the answer is, "Nothing short of an angelic visitation," then you might be a fanatic. If on the other hand, the answer is simple, "If I pray and feel like God wants me to attend a different church, I will." Then you are probably not a fanatic.
But religion is not the only way people can be fanatics. Many people are fanatical about other things. Global Warming is one that I like to talk about. I had this argument with a friend. If we ask, "What would it take to change your mind about Global Warming?" And the answer is, "Nothing, Global Warming is Science!" then you are a fanatic. If on the other hand, the answer is, "If we take regional temperatures on a monthly basis and compare them to like months over a 5-year span, the result should show a warming trend or not." Then you are not a fanatic.
Here is the tip. If you don't have a reasonable way to change your mind. Especially if you don't have ANY way to change your mind, then you are a fanatic. And your argument or belief is probably false.
So, what would it take to change your mind?
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
So I started this story when a friend of mine and I were discussing how we learned about science. I was saying that I had learned a lot about science by reading science fiction. He was not convinced and was of the opinion that there would be too much fake science.
So I started writing this short story to prove my point. I showed him the rough draft. It wasn't the end of the argument but I did use it in my argument.
Then it went on the shelf. Or at least the digital shelf. When I started to publish my short stories, the characters in this story started a protest. They wanted to be published as well. I couldn't find a good reason to keep them confined, so they have been release.
I'm happy to publish a short story about a young man who is socially awkward but has great talent. He is an artist who paints with stars. To do this he has to know and discuss a few parts of astrophysics.
Not all is sweetness and light. He has a rival that is jealous and attempts to sabotage his ship. Things look a bit grim for a while.
You'll have to read the story to find out if Baxter can save himself and his friends. And to find out if he can overcome his limitations to make new friends. And to find out how he paints with stars.
To Paint with all the Colors of the Visible Spectrum is now available on Amazon.
Monday, February 6, 2017
James Grey is a man trying to make a living. He goes on a salvage mission and gets more than he bargained for. Basically, it's a man in a space suit, with an airlock, and a limited amount of time.
It's a short story.
I started out playing with some ideas for a video game that a group of friends and I were thinking about developing. This is not one of the ideas that had any traction, but the small, one sentence note that I had jotted down about this story kept bugging me. I kept seeing it and thinking about it. So I started to add a bit more detail to it.
In a few days I had a plot, a character, and then a rough draft. So I showed it to a friend of mine. He hated it. But while he was reading it, I wrote the plot outlines for nine more stories based on James Grey and his AI partner Jeeves.
As sometimes happens when we get negative feedback, I dropped the project and went back to my Novel. A novel that is now finished and available on Amazon, and Smashwords called Arbor Colony. Available in both eBook and Paperback.
My novel was looking lonely there with so few companions and suddenly this short story was back bugging me to be finished. So I sat down and read it again. One of two things happens when I read something that I wrote and set aside. Either I hate it, or I go "Wow, that is good. I should finish it."
So the Grey Space stories are back on the hopper to get finished. They should be pretty quick work to finish and get out there. So no one should be worried that I'm not going to finish Seed of Stars the next novel after Arbor Colony.
While you are waiting for it, check out this story and let me know what you think of it.